An AR scorecard your leadership team can question

A useful AR report makes it easier for leadership to decide what happens next. That requires more than counting calls and collecting favourable comments.

Activity belongs in the report. It shows whether the programme is delivering its commitments and where capacity is going. But a completed briefing establishes that a conversation happened. Understanding what changed requires a different kind of evidence.

Choose the business question first

Begin with the decision the scorecard should support. Are you trying to improve understanding of a new product? Prepare evidence for an evaluation? Help sales respond when analyst research enters a deal? Each objective needs different indicators.

A programme can serve several objectives, but each metric should have a clear reason to exist. If nobody can explain what they would change in response to a number, question whether it belongs in the leadership report.

Separate delivery, understanding and contribution

Use three views. Delivery covers completed work and open commitments. Understanding records what analysts demonstrably know, question or misunderstand. Commercial contribution captures documented use of research or AR support in a buyer decision.

The following is an illustrative reporting design, not an industry benchmark or a record of Kea client results.

For delivery, compare follow-up actions completed on time with those due. Use the action record to identify delays and ownership gaps. Completion tells you whether a promise was kept; it does not establish whether the work helped.

For understanding, keep dated questions or statements that reveal what an analyst knows or still misunderstands. Distinguish their words from your team’s interpretation. An unresolved misconception may call for stronger evidence or a focused update.

For commercial contribution, record the distinct sales opportunities in which the account team used AR support and how it used that support. That evidence can help you decide which support to continue or improve. It cannot, on its own, establish that AR caused a sale.

If evaluation readiness is a priority, track how many of the selected claims have validated evidence. Keep the full selection visible so an improving percentage cannot conceal dropped claims. Use the remaining gaps to assign work to product or customer teams.

Define the numbers before using them

Each indicator needs an owner, a collection method, a reporting period and a baseline. Define what counts as complete. Explain whether an opportunity is counted once or every time someone asks for help. Show missing data instead of quietly treating it as zero.

Set targets against your own objective and capacity. A target borrowed from another company can make a report look precise while directing effort towards the wrong work.

Show the decision behind the result

Consider this illustrative monthly snapshot. Ten follow-up actions were due and eight were completed on time. Four priority product claims needed validation; only two were ready. Three unique sales opportunities used AR support, but only one account team has confirmed how the material was used.

The report should show 8/10 for timely follow-up and 2/4 for evidence readiness, with the underlying records available. It should report three supported opportunities and the missing feedback on two of them. It cannot conclude that AR improved win rates or generated the full value of those deals.

The useful management response is specific: resolve the two overdue actions, secure product time to validate the remaining claims, and ask the two account owners for feedback. More briefings would not necessarily solve any of those problems.

Avoid collapsing these different indicators into a single percentage labelled “AR effectiveness”. A strong activity result can conceal a serious evidence gap. If you use weighting internally, explain the choices and show the underlying measures.

Be careful with commercial attribution

If analyst research appeared in a successful opportunity, report what you know: where it entered the process, how the buyer or salesperson used it, and what evidence supports that account. The full contract value is not automatically revenue created by AR.

Keep buyer testimony, sales interpretation and your own inference distinguishable. Deduplicate opportunities across reporting periods. Where the outcome is unknown, say so. This gives leadership something it can question and trust.

Review the strategy as well as the work

Use routine reporting to check delivery. At a deliberate strategy review, ask whether the objective still makes sense. A new buyer segment, a change in product direction or a shift in analyst coverage can make yesterday's target less useful even when the team keeps achieving it.

Keep a short narrative alongside the numbers: what changed, why it matters, what the team proposes and where leadership support is needed. Do not fill a fixed “top three” box with two weak observations because only one material development occurred.

End the report with decisions: which evidence needs investment, which analyst priorities should change, and which activities should stop. The scorecard has done its job when it improves those choices.

Share this article