Kea Insight / Analyst Relations

The Magic Quadrant: Don’t Obsess, Don’t Ignore

By Derk Erbé

Some executive teams make improving their Magic Quadrant position the main objective of Analyst Relations. Others dismiss the report entirely. Both decisions can be made before anyone has established how the company’s buyers actually use the research.

The useful question is how much attention the evaluation deserves in this particular market. A serious answer connects buyer behaviour, commercial priorities and the resources required to participate well. It gives leadership a basis for investment that is stronger than either enthusiasm for a chart or frustration with its conclusions.

Understand its role in your market

Ask customers and prospects which sources they use to identify and compare suppliers. Where possible, establish whether a report helped create a shortlist, influenced evaluation criteria or simply provided background. Those are different roles and should not be treated as interchangeable.

Sales teams can contribute concrete examples from opportunities, provided they distinguish direct buyer feedback from their own interpretation. A report being mentioned in a deal is useful evidence of relevance. It is not, on its own, proof that the report determined the outcome.

That investigation should cover the broader analyst ecosystem. Different buying teams may use different research firms, specialist advisers or independent experts. A programme built around one evaluation can leave the company poorly understood by other people who matter to its market.

Give the report its proper context

A Magic Quadrant evaluates a defined market using the methodology and criteria associated with that research. It is not a universal ranking of every supplier for every possible buyer. The written assessment, scope and publication date all matter when interpreting the graphic.

For a vendor, this means understanding whether the company’s business and target customers align with the market being assessed. If there is a material mismatch, spending heavily to pursue a preferred position may distract from more relevant commercial work. Establish that fit before treating the evaluation as a programme objective.

Set objectives the company can act on

Leadership needs to separate business improvements, communication improvements and the independent assessment itself. AR can organise evidence, clarify the company’s direction and ensure important developments are communicated. Product delivery, customer success and commercial execution remain responsibilities of the business.

Identify which buyer decisions the report can help inform.
Establish the capabilities and evidence relevant to the assessment.
Assign internal owners to gaps that require business action.
Agree what AR will communicate and when meaningful updates are available.
Prepare sales to explain the research accurately.
Protect time for other analysts and commercial priorities.

These objectives give the team work it can deliver and leadership progress it can review. A desired position may express an ambition, but it should not become a promise that AR can guarantee an independent judgement.

Budget for the wider programme

Participation can involve substantial executive, product, customer and AR time. Make that effort visible. An evaluation deadline should not arrive as an emergency that consumes every available person and leaves the rest of the programme idle.

Agree the level of investment in advance and revisit it when evidence changes. If buyers rarely use the report, a lighter approach may be appropriate. If it repeatedly influences relevant opportunities, preparation and sales enablement may deserve more attention. The decision should reflect the market the company sells into.

Review value beyond the graphic

After publication, look at the quality of the submission, the accuracy of the company’s representation, the usefulness of the written feedback and the questions coming from buyers. Consider what the process revealed about evidence gaps or market fit. These observations do not replace the outcome, but they make the review more useful than a discussion about coordinates alone.

A balanced strategy takes the Magic Quadrant seriously while keeping commercial relevance in view. For the next step, explore three common preparation mistakes and how a managed AR programme connects evaluations with sustained market engagement.

Put this into practice

Decide what your first AR move should be.

Assess your readiness, identify the gaps and agree where a focused programme could create value.

Explore AR Workshops

Not sure where to start? Take the eight-question AR Readiness Check.