Don’t Wait to Be Discovered: A Wake-up Call for Technology Vendors

Some technology vendors treat analyst attention as something that arrives automatically once the company is successful enough. Build the product, win the customers and wait for the market to notice. It is an attractive idea, but it places responsibility for explaining the company entirely in someone else’s hands.

Analysts do not work with complete information. They cover markets with many vendors, competing claims and changing customer requirements. A company can be relevant without being visible, or visible without being understood. Waiting to become impossible to ignore leaves both problems unresolved.

The market does not explain your company for you

A strong product announcement may tell an analyst that something has changed. It may not explain why that change matters, which buyers benefit or how the offering differs from alternatives. Those are questions the vendor is often well placed to answer, provided it brings useful information rather than another unsupported claim of leadership.

Expecting analysts to discover and reconstruct the whole story is no more reliable than expecting every prospective customer to do so. Research expertise helps analysts interpret a market; it does not give them unlimited time or access to every implementation, customer result and strategic decision.

Information can inform without buying agreement

Professional analyst relations gives relevant experts a better basis for understanding the business. That is a legitimate contribution to their work. It does not give the vendor control over their conclusions, nor does providing a briefing create an entitlement to coverage.

• Explain relevance: connect the company to a market problem within the analyst’s coverage.
• Make the evidence usable: provide clear customer examples, implementation details and appropriate supporting material.
• Address the difficult questions: discuss limitations and competitive alternatives as carefully as strengths.
• Maintain continuity: return when there is a meaningful development, rather than only when a report deadline approaches.

Begin before the moment feels urgent

A vendor that first makes contact when it needs inclusion in research has little relationship history to draw on. The analyst may need time to understand the company, examine its evidence and decide whether it fits the research. An urgent commercial objective at the vendor does not remove those requirements.

A more useful approach is to establish relevance early and build understanding through a sequence of substantive exchanges. The team can learn which parts of its story are unclear and improve the evidence before those gaps become obstacles in an evaluation.

Make the next interaction worthwhile

Start with a small number of analysts whose coverage matches your target market. Prepare a clear explanation of the company and identify the evidence that supports it. Ask what remains unclear, listen to the answer and act on it. That gives the relationship a purpose beyond being noticed.

Analysts are neither a mysterious external force nor a publicity channel waiting to be activated. They are informed professionals whose understanding depends partly on the quality of the information available to them. Help make that information better.

Explore why analyst relations matters and Kea’s approach to building an ongoing AR programme.

Put this into practice

Give analyst engagement an owner and a next step.

Build preparation, follow-through and measurement into a sustained programme around your business priorities.

Explore AR-as-a-Service ↗

Not sure where to start? Take the eight-question AR Readiness Check.

Share this article